Fact Sheet: How Can The U.S. Be “Pro-Israel” While It Supports Anti-Semites In Ukraine?

The United States has what is called a “special relationship” with Israel.  Just one problem with this: The U.S. is supporting neo-Nazis in Ukraine.

AFP Photo / Yuriy Dyachyshyn

How can the U.S. be “pro-Israel” if it is assisting and training anti-Semites? And how is it that the U.S. supports neo-Nazi extremists today even after 6 million Jews were targeted and methodically murdered by Nazis during WWII?

Pentagon officials announced that U.S. troops from the 173rd Airborne will deploy to Ukraine in March to help build the Ukrainian National Guard.  The Pentagon neglected to mention that prominent members of the Ukrainian National Guard include the Azov battalion, a leading neo-Nazi group formed in 2014.

In addition to sending U.S. troops, Washington has already sent heavy military equipment and has earmarked $19 million for Ukrainian forces.

Pictured from left to right: 1) Soldiers of Ukrainian Azov battalion - Oct. 2014. 2) Svoboda Party marching with Stepan Bandera poster - Oct. 2013). 3) Patriot of Ukraine battalion during protest in Kiev - Feb. 2014. 4) Andriy Biletsky at Patriot of Ukraine conference - Apr. 2008.

Azov is “run by the extremist Patriot of Ukraine organization, which considers Jews and other minorities sub-human,” and was founded by Andriy Biletsky, who is also head of two neo-Nazi organizations, the Patriot of Ukraine and the Social-National Assembly.

Azov symbols compared to Nazi symbols

Biletsky, who was elected to the Rada (Ukraine’s parliament) in November, wrote in 2010, “The historic mission of our nation in this critical moment is to lead the white races of the world in a final crusade for their survival. A crusade against the Semite-led sub-humans.”

Support for the Azov militia comes on top of U.S. backing of the Svoboda Party, a group condemned by a 2012 European Parliament resolution as “racist, anti-Semitic and xenophobic,” and Pravy Sektor, a nationalist organization that has been characterized as neo-fascist.  Ukraine’s U.S.-backed government is “unrepentant about using the neo-Nazis,” according to The Telegraph.

John McCain and Victoria Nuland meeting with Ukrainian neo-Nazis
Svoboda leader Oleh Tyahnybok was expelled from parliament in 2004 after giving a speech demanding that Ukrainians fight against a “Muscovite-Jewish mafia,” and for praising World War II partisans who fought Jews and “other scum.”
In 2005 Tyahnybok demanded that Ukraine do more to halt “criminal activities” of “organized Jewry,” and, even now, Svoboda openly calls for Ukrainian citizens to have their ethnicity printed onto their passports.

Tyahnybok also declared that Nazi death camp guard John Demjanjuk was a hero who was “fighting for truth.”

Another top Svoboda member, Yuriy Mykhalchyshyn, a deputy in parliament, often quotes Nazi Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels, as well as other Third Reich luminaries like Ernst Rohm and Gregor Strasser.
The BBC reported that Pravy Sektor is the most radical wing of Ukraine’s Maidan protest movement that toppled President Viktor Yanukovych in February, 2014.
Pravy Sektor
Its leader, Dmytro Yarosh, who won a seat in Parliament, calls himself a follower of Stepan Bandera, a Nazi collaborator during WWII. In 2013, Yarosh was put on Interpol’s wanted list for “public incitement to terrorist and extremist activities.”
SO WHY IS THE U.S. SIDING WITH NEO-NAZIS IN UKRAINE?
“Ukraine, a new and important space on the Eurasian chessboard, is a geopolitical pivot because its very existence as an independent country helps to transform Russia. Without Ukraine, Russia ceases to be a Eurasian empire,” wrote former US National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski in his 1997 book, The Grand Chessboard.

“However, if Moscow regains control over Ukraine, with its 52 million people and major resources as well as access to the Black Sea, Russia automatically again regains the wherewithal to become a powerful imperial state, spanning Europe and Asia,” said Brzezinski, who has been labeled, “The man behind Obama’s foreign policy.”

Brzezinski recently told the Senate Armed Services committee that the U.S. and its allies should send troops to the Baltic states.  In the context of the U.S. opposing a UN resolution designed to combat glorification of Nazism (the only other countries to vote against the resolution were Canada and Ukraine) an impression is created that the U.S. will use any means necessary to achieve its goals in Eurasia.
Nazi Ukraine soldiers 2014

About the Author

 

– Chris Ernesto is co-founder of St. Pete for Peace, an antiwar organization in St. Petersburg, FL that has been active since 2003. Mr. Ernesto also created and manages OccupyArrests.com and USinAfrica.com.

 

2015-02-27

Source: http://www.ukrainewar.info/fact-sheet-can-u-s-pro-israel-supports-anti-semites-ukraine-2/

NAZI Ukrainian soldiers

RELATED POSTS
Phantom Tanks and the Desperation of Kiev
How many times have we seen this before? The President of the United States is on TV telling us horror stories. Some innocent people in some corner of the world are being crushed, he tells us. They face some monstrously evil oppressor, he says. While the United States doesn’t like war, what choice is there? Sacrifices must be made, cruise missiles must be unleashed, to protect the poor and innocent. The world is the set of an action movie, and the US is the tragic hero, forced to rescue the innocent. This is the script we heard in former Yugoslavia. Bill Clinton claimed to be stoping “mass rapes” and “concentration camps.” After the smoke had cleared, and thousands had been killed, the truth came out. The United Nations admitted that no “genocide” had taken place. The talk of mass rapes and concentration camps had been hype. While the alleged crimes used to justify ...
READ MORE
NATO: Proudly Delivering Death Since 1949 – A Book Review
THE GLOBALIZATION OF NATO Author:  Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya Clarity Press (2012) ISBN:  978-0-9852710-2-2 Pages:  411 with complete index Available to order from Global Research The world is enveloped in a blanket of perpetual conflict. Invasions, occupation, illicit sanctions, and regime change have become currencies and orders of the day. One organization – the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) – is repeatedly, and very controversially, involved in some form or another in many of these conflicts led by the US and its allies. NATO spawned from the Cold War. Its existence was justified by Washington and Western Bloc politicians as a guarantor against any Soviet and Eastern Bloc invasion of Western Europe, but all along the Alliance served to cement Washington’s influence in Europe and continue what was actually America’s post-World War II occupation of the European continent. In 1991 the raison d’être of the Soviet threat ended with the collapse of the USSR and the ...
READ MORE
How America Double-Crossed Russia and Shamed West
The conditionality of the Soviet Union’s agreement to allow East Germany to be taken by West Germany and for the Cold War to end, was that NATO would not expand «one inch to the east». This was the agreement that was approved by the Russian President of the Soviet Union, Mikhail Gorbachev, a great man and a subsequent hero to democrats around the world. He agreed then to end the Soviet Union and abandon communism and thus to end the entire Cold War; he agreed to this because he had been promised that NATO would expand not «one inch to the east,» or «one inch eastward,» depending upon how the promise was translated and understood — but it has the same meaning, no matter how it was translated. He trusted American President George Herbert Walker Bush, whose friend and Secretary of State James Baker made this promise to Gorbachev. With this ...
READ MORE
Appeal from U.S. to World: Help Us Resist U.S. Crimes
Since the end of the Cold War, the United States of America has systematically violated the prohibition against the threat or use of force contained in the UN Charter and the Kellogg Briand Pact. It has carved out a regime of impunity for its crimes based on its UN Security Council veto, non-recognition of international courts and sophisticated "information warfare" that undermines the rule of law with political justifications for otherwise illegal threats and uses of force. Former Nuremberg prosecutor Benjamin B. Ferencz has compared current U.S. policy to the illegal German "preemptive first strike" policy for which senior German officials were convicted of aggression at Nuremberg and sentenced to death by hanging. In 2002, the late U.S. Senator Edward Kennedy described post-September 11th U.S. doctrine as "a call for 21st century American imperialism that no other nation can or should accept." And yet the U.S. government has succeeded in assembling alliances ...
READ MORE
Ukraine Commemorates V-Day By Waging War And Honoring Nazi Criminals
US-installed Ukrainian fascists commemorated Poroshenko’s established victory in Europe Day of Remembrance by vowing to “destroy Moscow,” free its people, and let them “shape their own future.” Ukrainian ultranationalists attending a May 8 commemoration included 14th SS Waffen Grenadier division veterans, Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA) members, and Nazi-infested volunteer battalions involved in what they call “the Russian-Ukrainian war.” Svoboda party overt Nazis participated. Their slogan is “Ukraine for the Ukrainians” – meaning ethnically pure, free of Jews, Russians and others not wanted, by extermination or other means. Party member Yuri Sirotyuk called war on Russia Ukraine’s historic mission. “I believe that if we truly want it, we will do it,” he blustered. Obama’s Ukrainian allies are over-the-top lunatics like Sirotyuk and likeminded fascists wanting war, not peace. Prime minister Arseny Yatsenyuk  referring to World War II accused Soviet Russia of invading Germany. Nazi collaborator Stepan Bandera is honored as a national hero. His Organization of Ukrainian ...
READ MORE
Paul Craig Roberts 2015: Washington’s Path to War with Russia
MP3 & SHOW NOTES: http://themindrenewed.com/interviews/… Dr. Paul Craig Roberts (former US Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy) returns to the programme for an extended interview on the ongoing tensions between Washington and Moscow. Drawing upon his extensive experience in government, academia and journalism, Dr. Roberts explains how Washington’s current hostility towards Russia, with its demonization of Vladimir Putin, is a bitter fruit of the neoconservative ideology of world hegemony that came to dominate US centres of power from the early 1990s onwards. Assessing the geopolitical landscape with an eye to historical, economic and political realities, Dr. Roberts judges there to be only two hopes for the world to avert nuclear Armageddon: a Europe decisively resistant to Washington diktat, or economic collapse of the US empire itself. We also discuss the murder of Boris Nemtsov, prospects for Washington-agitated colour revolutions in Central Asia/Caucasus, MH17 and the growth of the police state ...
READ MORE
Ken Livingstone: Creation of Israel was ‘a great catastrophe’
In Arabic TV interview, Labour’s ex-London mayor blames Israel for IS attacks in Europe and mass expulsion of Jews from Arab world, again claims Hitler supported Zionism Former London mayor Ken Livingstone on Wednesday called the creation of Israel “fundamentally wrong,” and “a great catastrophe.” The existence of the Jewish state in the Middle East, he said, could ultimately lead to nuclear war. “The creation of the state of Israel was fundamentally wrong, because there had been a Palestinian community there for 2,000 years,” Livingstone told an Arabic language TV station based in London, in a clip posted and translated by the watchdog MEMRI group. “The creation of the state of Israel was a great catastrophe,” he repeated. “We should have absorbed the post-World War II Jewish refugees in Britain and America. They could all have been resettled, whereas 70 years later, the situation is still very tense, and there is potential for ...
READ MORE
Russia And The Ukraine – The Other Side Of The Story
We ”know” how evil the Russians and Putin are, yet most Americans know little about this area of the world: a recent poll found only 1 in 6 Americans could locate the Ukraine on a map. Beyond geography, the US, a historical “newcomer”, has often underappreciated the importance of history and related cultural differences. Russians and Ukrainians, comprising the “Eastern Slavs”, are ethnically related. Were it not for some tragic history, they would have had closer ties today than those afforded by the US/UK “special relationship”. Their history stretches back at least 700 years before the first settlers landed in America when Kiev was the center of power of a nascent Russian state. In the early 15th century, as the center of power shifted north-eastward, Moscow assumed the mantle of power. After Mongol domination ended in the early 15th century, Russia has had to fend of numerous  threats – then powerful Poland/Lithuania union in ...
READ MORE
Phantom Tanks and the Desperation of Kiev
NATO: Proudly Delivering Death Since 1949 – A Book Review
How America Double-Crossed Russia and Shamed West
Appeal from U.S. to World: Help Us Resist U.S. Crimes
Ukraine Commemorates V-Day By Waging War And Honoring Nazi Criminals
Paul Craig Roberts 2015: Washington’s Path to War with Russia
Ken Livingstone: Creation of Israel was ‘a great catastrophe’
Russia And The Ukraine – The Other Side Of The Story
Share

5 thoughts on “Fact Sheet: How Can The U.S. Be “Pro-Israel” While It Supports Anti-Semites In Ukraine?

  1. Categories: Југославија, Хрвати

    Tags: Ante, AVNOJ, Broz, Budak, Crna legija, crvene ustaše, Draža, Francetić, Hrvatska, HSP, Jadovno, Jasenovac, Jugoslavija, Kalabić, Kolinda, KPJ, Kumrovec, Mesić, Mihailović, Mile, partizani, Pavelić, Srbi Srbija, Starčević, Tito, Tuđman, ubice, Zagreb, Јасеновац, Југославија, АВНОЈ, Анте, Броз, Будак, Дража, Загреб, Калабић, КПЈ, Кумровец, Месић, Миле, Михаиловић, Павелић, партизани, Срби, Србија, Старчевић, Тито, Туђман, убице, Францетић, ХДЗ, Хрвати, Хрватска, ХСП, црвене усташе, Црна легија

Leave a Reply